Comments on: You Need Better Not More http://seo2.0.onreact.com/you-need-better-not-more Helping people with blogs, social media & search Thu, 09 May 2013 16:25:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Tim http://seo2.0.onreact.com/you-need-better-not-more#comment-192631 Tim Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:23:31 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=1265#comment-192631 I suppose logic behind would be preventing cycling of paid links into old blog posts for example – but as you say, relevance would be hampered. I’m going to test it out to be sure. I have a feeling you will be right though – it would be too difficult to differentiate genuine updates.

]]> By: onreact http://seo2.0.onreact.com/you-need-better-not-more#comment-191738 onreact Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:20:46 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=1265#comment-191738 Tim: Good point but I think I disagree. I can’t prove it but either someone else has tested it already or we should test this case to back either one of our claims.

The logical thing to do would be to re-index the new, updated anchor texts or links. Otherwise Google would be outdated.

]]> By: Tim http://seo2.0.onreact.com/you-need-better-not-more#comment-191683 Tim Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:28:35 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=1265#comment-191683 Exempted though would be keyword links – I’m sure that Google only scans once and doesn’t give credit for amendments (on links).

]]> By: Aarn Farmer http://seo2.0.onreact.com/you-need-better-not-more#comment-187945 Aarn Farmer Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:28:00 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=1265#comment-187945 Good post. I can honestly say that I have never gone back and edited a post after it went live. I just figured once it was up, it was up.

]]>