SEO BLOG

Search & Social Media Survival Guide

seo-2-0-results-raven-seo-tools.png

SEO 2.0 rankings for SEO 2.0 in the last 12 weeks, Raven SEO Tools chart.

Just recently Yahoo updated their Index to offer “more relevant results” which allegedly are “more like Google“. I was amazed to find out that the contrary is the case. Yahoo Search results are total crap now.

Usually I don’t use such strong language but to be sure that it’s just Yahoo I conducted a little test. I manually tested my rankings in the search results for the keyphrases that my SEO 2.0 blog is undoubtedly or at least very likely most relevant: SEO 2.0, Tadeusz Szewczyk, Tad Chef and onreact.

What did I find? On Yahoo, almost nothing, MSN/Windows Live is almost as bad but Yahoo manages to be even worse.

The test yielded one more surprise, Google is not the single most relevant search engine out there. Check out the results:

seo-2-0-rankings-test.png

*onreact.com homepage

I used the proxy server service to mimic a US citizen and not to get personalized or localized results from Germany where I live.

Conclusion:
Yahoo and MSN/Windows Live sucked. Ask and Cuil did not. Sadly both have given up by now.

Last updated November 17th, 2010.

Related posts:

  1. SEO Company, SEO and Search Engine Optimization Google Results Are a Disgrace
  2. SEO Test: Default Personalized Search is a Myth – It Doesn’t Work
  3. Software for SEO: Tools, Why & How to Track Rankings in a Personalized Search World
  4. Search: 8 Reasons Why Wolfram Alpha is a Waste of Time and no Threat to Google
  5. Quora vs Yahoo Answers: Which Q&A Site is Better for Your Business?

August 8, 2008 | You can follow comments through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a comment, or trackback.

Need help? Consider a world class blog & SEO consultation by the author of SEO 2.0, Tad Chef. For full fledged SEO services like ongoing link building, contact my partners from SEO.com or look up my directory of SEO service providers and checkout reputable companies like Datadial or Redfly.

Already an SEO? Consider applying to be added to my exclusive SEO agency directory. Only selected companies get included. Find out whether you are eligible to submit your site.

This thing has 10 Comments

  1. Posted August 8, 2008 at 23:21 | Permalink

    Hi,

    It does not really affect some of my sites the Yahoo! Changes.
    I would like to thank you a lot for the Ucloak link. It is really useful for me as I live in another country as well and I have been looking for something like that in a while.

    Many Thanks

  2. Posted August 9, 2008 at 14:36 | Permalink

    Hi,

    small mistake in your conclusion – the link that is supposed to bring you to ask.com brings you to cuil.com ;)

  3. Posted August 11, 2008 at 01:05 | Permalink

    Thanks Pascal! Fixed.

  4. Posted August 11, 2008 at 21:30 | Permalink

    The problem with this post is that it suggests that people are actually using Yahoo and MSN :) (sorry forgot about the no smiley face rule :P)

  5. Posted August 12, 2008 at 10:30 | Permalink

    Andrew, in the US some people still do.

  6. Posted August 14, 2008 at 13:21 | Permalink

    I wish there were a search engine out there that would at least give Google a run for it’s money. Competition adds at least some balance and choice. It keeps Google on their toes and in check.

  7. Alain Saffel
    Posted August 18, 2008 at 20:36 | Permalink

    I agree with Stephan about there being another SE that would challenge Google. It would be nice to see. Yahoo! doesn’t seem to know which way to go right now. They’re in the best place to challenge Google though.

    I am not a big fan of Cuil. Doing a vanity search on it brings up a lot of dated blog links. I really don’t like the layout of it either, nor do I like the huge clip of text.

    Ask seems to be improving lately. I never use MSN. Yahoo is a little more on my radar, but barely.

    Sad to say, Google generally gives the best results. Competition would be a good thing. Maybe MSN and Yahoo! joining forces would be a good thing after all. Did I just say that?? hehe

  8. Favorite M
    Posted August 20, 2008 at 15:16 | Permalink

    That’s why i don’t use yahoo..
    But sometimes my website has a better place on yahoo… but there are no big diferences

  9. Posted September 9, 2008 at 19:14 | Permalink

    MSN is the one that throws me off. The seem to place way too much weight on the domain name. I always find these long keyword rich domains with like 4 dashes ranking on top.

  10. Posted September 25, 2008 at 00:32 | Permalink

    I’m not saying this in any way to be argumentative, but perhaps Yahoo is doing a better job detecting that you are manipulating the search results and treating your site accordingly. Even if your site should “naturally” rank high on those terms. Perhaps it’s like the Google -30 that I’ve heard about.

Post a Comment

Please mind the commenting netiquette, most notably:

  • A "name" is a real name or nick name, not a keyword! SEO Company is wrong. John Doe of Google is OK.
  • For the "website" URL: No deep links allowed unless it's your "about" page.
  • No extra signature allowed, one "website" link is enough.
  • No bot-like "Thank you" comments with no context or added value to the post.

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*