Ads

Compete Search Analytics

Archives

There are thousands of SEO blogs out there. Most of them stick in the past though and only repeat slightly changed yesterday news. In SEO 2.0 the world of search engine optimization has substantially changed. Only a few blogs reflect this major shift.

Indeed, I am convinced that you need only 5 blogs to inform yourself properly in SEO 2.0 matters. In showing what sources are dealing with SEO 2.0 I will prepare my own definition of the 2.0 in SEO.

1. SEOmoz: Rand Fishkin and staff, as close as you can be to SEO 2.0

2. SEO Book: Aaron Wall, author of what should be called the SEO 2.0 book

3. Pronet Advertising: Multiple authors on the edge

4. Problogger: Darren Rowse, the blogging professional, the professional “pro” blogger

5. Copyblogger: If content is king, he is the king’s best knight

Those 5 are perfectly sufficient. On the other hand: You just can’t ignore those five SEO or SEO related blogs if you want to drive traffic to your site or blog. Skip all the other thousands of publications. Information overdose won’t make you any smarter. It will just confuse you. Concentrate on those 5 sources.

Of course in the near future you will need 6: The SEO 2.0 blog is going to be one of the most important sources of SEO 2.0 expertise.

del.icio.us StumbleUpon Facebook Google Mixx Sphinn TwitThis
July, 2007 | You can follow comments through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a comment, or trackback.

This thing has 10 Comments

  1. Posted July 24, 2007 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    Ah, you do know that Copyblogger and Problogger aren’t SEO blogs, right?

    What about www.SearchEngineLand.com and blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog ?

  2. Posted July 24, 2007 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    Ah Lee… you know as well as anyone that the hardest part of SEO is getting links, and the primary way to do that is with compelling content. This is different than SEO 1.0 and the days of WebPosition Gold gurus and the like, so why isn’t Copyblogger part of SEO 2.0?

    The bigger question to ask, as you’ve asked before on your own blog, is what will become of SEO? Isn’t technical SEO just a small part of an overall marketing plan? In that case, I’m glad Copyblogger is not an “SEO blog,” because that means it’s built on something that will last.

  3. Posted July 24, 2007 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    OK Lee, but they are SEO 2.0 blogs! Take into account that by showing what SEO 2.0 is, based on people who practice it already, I define it step by step. I will even extend the definition of SEO inasmuch as blogs like Fadtastic will also fit in. SEO 1.0 is too narrow minded as you yourself correctly wrote.

    www.SearchEngineLand.com and blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog are great powerful dinosaurs. They just adapt to the new sitaution without leading the new wave.

    Maybe I change my mind in the course of events as Sphinn is of course SEO 2.0

    Brian, you were too quick for me, but I see you have an excellent understanding of what I want to show with this list.

  4. Posted August 9, 2007 at 3:26 am | Permalink

    I would definitely list www.sphinn.com as a top 3 SEO web2.0 site: The only social media site that welcomes linkbaiters!

  5. Posted August 9, 2007 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    Well, Sphinn definitely is great but it’s not a blog and you still have too much info overflow to sift through… Very time consuming…

  6. Posted August 29, 2007 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    >

    Most people aren’t used to the term “SEM 2.0″ so they would figure you meant to say they are “WEB 2.0″ blogs - until they read your blog more thoroughly.

    Also, I agree with Lee - you cant leave out the blog run by the person who pretty much coined the term SEO - Danny Sullivan - Search Engine Land.

  7. Posted October 20, 2007 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, I found the list on my own!

    I don’t know how succesfull you are in business, but your art of blogging is cool ;)

    regards, Marc

  8. Posted February 27, 2008 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    Brians and Lees discussion was pretty interesting. i can;t think of one good reason to disagree with Brian.

  9. Posted March 1, 2008 at 1:05 am | Permalink

    I can’t disagree with that list at all. Every one of those puts out awesome stuff.

  10. Mark Thomas
    Posted March 4, 2008 at 5:23 am | Permalink

    I’d not include ProBlogger and copyblogger as SEO websites.

    But rather I would include:

    http://marketingeasy.net
    http://www.searchengineland.com/
    and
    a general subscription at Digital Points forum.

This thing has 3 Trackbacks

  1. Posted July 25, 2007 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    […] will kill SEO as you know it” is such a link incitement, but even my former headlines “The Only 5 SEO 2.0 Blogs You Need“, “10 Reasons Not to Use Digg“, “10 Reasons Why You Don’t Need to Read […]

  2. Posted September 15, 2007 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    […] overview quickly which blogs really matter or stand out while other people have to stick to the same old blogs. If you have more time to spend on blog reading take into consideration checking out those 10 blogs […]

  3. Posted September 24, 2007 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    […] I admit it, I read more than 5 SEO blogs, indeed I read more than the other 10 SEO, make money and blogging blogs I mentioned some day ago. […]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*