<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Day PageRank Died</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died</link>
	<description>Search &#38; Social Media Survival Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: onreact</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-198897</link>
		<dc:creator>onreact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-198897</guid>
		<description>Adrian: Ther are people who still talk about meta tags and search engine submission. Either you live in the past or today, you decide. Buying links is not just a quick fix it&#039;s also a risky one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian: Ther are people who still talk about meta tags and search engine submission. Either you live in the past or today, you decide. Buying links is not just a quick fix it&#8217;s also a risky one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Grossett</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-198877</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Grossett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-198877</guid>
		<description>This is good information - however I know that consultants (having worked in SEO)to this day still rely on page rank especially when link building for keywords etc - after all its the quickest way to access how much Google rates the website to consider buying links or paying directory submission fee&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good information &#8211; however I know that consultants (having worked in SEO)to this day still rely on page rank especially when link building for keywords etc &#8211; after all its the quickest way to access how much Google rates the website to consider buying links or paying directory submission fee&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jirafan of mp3 house</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-74089</link>
		<dc:creator>jirafan of mp3 house</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-74089</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;google is an force.. cannot be defeted&lt;br /&gt;
sometimes sucks.. sometimes rules&lt;br /&gt;
this is virtual life..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google is an force.. cannot be defeted<br />
sometimes sucks.. sometimes rules<br />
this is virtual life..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueCherryDoughnut :: Fun with Comics</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-38758</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueCherryDoughnut :: Fun with Comics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-38758</guid>
		<description>[...] what criteria even? What purpose does PR serve? Why does everyone worry so much about it? No one really knows&#8230; (interesting article, should you decide to click the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what criteria even? What purpose does PR serve? Why does everyone worry so much about it? No one really knows&#8230; (interesting article, should you decide to click the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catfish</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-10625</link>
		<dc:creator>Catfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-10625</guid>
		<description>You are too quick to jump to conclusions based on limited observations and data sets.  Page Rank will continue to be important in the Google algorithm if for no other reason than its the biggest percieved differentiator for their search results for the investing public.  Thank about.  They built a search engine that was better than everyone elses based on an algorithm and no they are going to throw it away?  After they are worth BILLIONS if not TRILLIONS of dollars?  Think a little more logically man.  Just because your successful using Web 2.0 for traffic dosen&#039;t mean that search isn&#039;t important anymore or that it can&#039;t produce just as profitable results, IF your successful.  And as someone who claims to be an expert in SEO, I can&#039;t imagine you not being successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are too quick to jump to conclusions based on limited observations and data sets.  Page Rank will continue to be important in the Google algorithm if for no other reason than its the biggest percieved differentiator for their search results for the investing public.  Thank about.  They built a search engine that was better than everyone elses based on an algorithm and no they are going to throw it away?  After they are worth BILLIONS if not TRILLIONS of dollars?  Think a little more logically man.  Just because your successful using Web 2.0 for traffic dosen&#8217;t mean that search isn&#8217;t important anymore or that it can&#8217;t produce just as profitable results, IF your successful.  And as someone who claims to be an expert in SEO, I can&#8217;t imagine you not being successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmm...Build Google PageRank to Increase Rankings!</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-9919</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmm...Build Google PageRank to Increase Rankings!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-9919</guid>
		<description>[...] all know PageRank Died long time ago, and has nothing to do with rankings. There are so many examples of sites that have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all know PageRank Died long time ago, and has nothing to do with rankings. There are so many examples of sites that have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google PageRank is NOT Important for Search Engine Rankings!</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-9835</link>
		<dc:creator>Google PageRank is NOT Important for Search Engine Rankings!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 05:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-9835</guid>
		<description>[...] should you be worried about that green rectangle bar, when there are so many other factors. Google PageRank Died long ago, and when Google started to penalize sites it became [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] should you be worried about that green rectangle bar, when there are so many other factors. Google PageRank Died long ago, and when Google started to penalize sites it became [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan J. Yoder</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-2903</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan J. Yoder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-2903</guid>
		<description>I find it amusing that you&#039;ve continually managed to ignore the vast majority of my original argument and obsessed over the paragraph about China.

&quot;So you do not even deny being anti-democratic? &quot;

I didn&#039;t address it because it was a ludicrous, baseless and knee-jerk reaction to my comment.  I didn&#039;t think it was necessary to refute something so absurd. I hope that you don&#039;t honestly think that people who think Google should be in China are automatically anti-democratic.

If you&#039;re suggesting that my previous silence established that I was anti-democratic, you&#039;re engaging in a fallacy called an &quot;argument from silence.&quot;

Google is an opportunist?  Google provides their services to the entire world.  The ability to do this since their inception has always existed.  How could opportunism come into play here?

Have you ever thought that Google *gasp* just wants to provide a search engine to EVERYONE?

&quot;Nonetheless it’s something completely different whether I as a person buy some cheap stuff at the super market or whether a huge multinational, one of the most powerful companies in the world supports a regime.&quot;

So you would be saying the same thing if you were buying products made in Nazi Germany?  In aggregate, individual U.S. citizens give far, far more to China than Google does.

And in what areas are they making money off Google?  Lets see...uhm, taxes for their Chinese office and network infrastructure....that&#039;s it.

By the way, your proposition results in abuse of Chinese.  Using your logic, no corporations should ever do business with China, thereby depriving them of a massive amount of important imports into their country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it amusing that you&#8217;ve continually managed to ignore the vast majority of my original argument and obsessed over the paragraph about China.</p>
<p>&#8220;So you do not even deny being anti-democratic? &#8221;</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t address it because it was a ludicrous, baseless and knee-jerk reaction to my comment.  I didn&#8217;t think it was necessary to refute something so absurd. I hope that you don&#8217;t honestly think that people who think Google should be in China are automatically anti-democratic.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re suggesting that my previous silence established that I was anti-democratic, you&#8217;re engaging in a fallacy called an &#8220;argument from silence.&#8221;</p>
<p>Google is an opportunist?  Google provides their services to the entire world.  The ability to do this since their inception has always existed.  How could opportunism come into play here?</p>
<p>Have you ever thought that Google *gasp* just wants to provide a search engine to EVERYONE?</p>
<p>&#8220;Nonetheless it’s something completely different whether I as a person buy some cheap stuff at the super market or whether a huge multinational, one of the most powerful companies in the world supports a regime.&#8221;</p>
<p>So you would be saying the same thing if you were buying products made in Nazi Germany?  In aggregate, individual U.S. citizens give far, far more to China than Google does.</p>
<p>And in what areas are they making money off Google?  Lets see&#8230;uhm, taxes for their Chinese office and network infrastructure&#8230;.that&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>By the way, your proposition results in abuse of Chinese.  Using your logic, no corporations should ever do business with China, thereby depriving them of a massive amount of important imports into their country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onreact</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-2897</link>
		<dc:creator>onreact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-2897</guid>
		<description>So you do not even deny being anti-democratic? Hey, I just insulted you! Didn&#039;t you notice? There are always reasons why opportunists support deadly regimes. 

I am not living in a wood cabin myself so I certainly buy Chinese products, but I try to avoid them. Nonetheless it&#039;s something completely different whether I as a person buy some cheap stuff at the super market or whether a huge multinational, one of the most powerful companies in the world supports a regime. Even if it&#039;s just by sticking to the rules of the dictatorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you do not even deny being anti-democratic? Hey, I just insulted you! Didn&#8217;t you notice? There are always reasons why opportunists support deadly regimes. </p>
<p>I am not living in a wood cabin myself so I certainly buy Chinese products, but I try to avoid them. Nonetheless it&#8217;s something completely different whether I as a person buy some cheap stuff at the super market or whether a huge multinational, one of the most powerful companies in the world supports a regime. Even if it&#8217;s just by sticking to the rules of the dictatorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan J. Yoder</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-2856</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan J. Yoder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 23:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/the-day-pagerank-died#comment-2856</guid>
		<description>So I take it that you never buy products made in China?  You better do some checking, lots of parts and complete products are made there.  Better not be a hypocrite.

Google only provides a service to China and the Chinese government itself could access Google in any country they wanted to (since they control the Great Firewall).  In other words, they&#039;re not providing anything the government didn&#039;t already have.  Also, it should be patently obvious that providing public services is not the same as providing special equipment.

By refusing to go to China, the ONLY thing that the Chinese government doesn&#039;t get is some money in taxes.  They already get far, far more from the numerous businesses there that do imports/exports and other business with the U.S. and other countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I take it that you never buy products made in China?  You better do some checking, lots of parts and complete products are made there.  Better not be a hypocrite.</p>
<p>Google only provides a service to China and the Chinese government itself could access Google in any country they wanted to (since they control the Great Firewall).  In other words, they&#8217;re not providing anything the government didn&#8217;t already have.  Also, it should be patently obvious that providing public services is not the same as providing special equipment.</p>
<p>By refusing to go to China, the ONLY thing that the Chinese government doesn&#8217;t get is some money in taxes.  They already get far, far more from the numerous businesses there that do imports/exports and other business with the U.S. and other countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

