Comments on: SEO vs SEO 2.0: Top 15 Differences http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:01:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: zmok.ru http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-61045 zmok.ru Wed, 08 Oct 2008 22:58:46 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-61045 social ways on seo2.0 have big sense! social ways on seo2.0 have big sense!

]]> By: RECURSOS WEB: SEO y SEO 2.0 | RECURSOS WEB PROFESIONALES http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-55331 RECURSOS WEB: SEO y SEO 2.0 | RECURSOS WEB PROFESIONALES Sat, 20 Sep 2008 00:30:37 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-55331 [...] divulgado y comentado últimamente. La fuente, como casi siempre, ha sido una pagina web en ingles (http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences).Espero sea de vuestro [...] […] divulgado y comentado últimamente. La fuente, como casi siempre, ha sido una pagina web en ingles (http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences).Espero sea de vuestro […]

]]> By: Michael Bastin http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-51191 Michael Bastin Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:32:07 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-51191 I'll be sure to let all my SEO friends know about this page. One thing is for sure, SEO nowadays is much harder than it used to be. If you have an old site, good for you, but promoting a new site is quite hard. I’ll be sure to let all my SEO friends know about this page. One thing is for sure, SEO nowadays is much harder than it used to be. If you have an old site, good for you, but promoting a new site is quite hard.

]]> By: annna http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-46450 annna Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:11:47 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-46450 In both ways of SEO there is all about contet (am I right?) but the difference is in how you 'sell' this content to people and - by which channels and exact methods. This comparition shows how the SEO 2.0 is more human than average SEO, more pleasant and better. Well done. In both ways of SEO there is all about contet (am I right?) but the difference is in how you ’sell’ this content to people and - by which channels and exact methods. This comparition shows how the SEO 2.0 is more human than average SEO, more pleasant and better. Well done.

]]> By: Nicholas http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-46446 Nicholas Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:56:24 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-46446 Wow! I didn't know, that there's something like SEO 2.0. It sounds like "Traffic Marketing" - your actions are performed for users, not for spiders. Very interesting article, but I hope SEO will be still efective, because I'm not good at writing "kick ass" articles. Wow! I didn’t know, that there’s something like SEO 2.0. It sounds like “Traffic Marketing” - your actions are performed for users, not for spiders. Very interesting article, but I hope SEO will be still efective, because I’m not good at writing “kick ass” articles.

]]> By: onreact http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-45081 onreact Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:13:47 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-45081 td, in fact you are right, I should add this or better revamp and republish this post. td, in fact you are right, I should add this or better revamp and republish this post.

]]> By: td of factoryfast.com.au http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-43306 td of factoryfast.com.au Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:30:48 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-43306 <p>Why oh why is there NO mention of content on the list? There ought to be a big mention about content. SEO 2.0 is, I think, largely about content and decent SEO work is about ensuring there is decent content at the site. Without decent content, the site's relevance and resourcefulness is in question, and then I don't see why it deserves to get good placement with the search engines. I want sites with good content.</p> Why oh why is there NO mention of content on the list? There ought to be a big mention about content. SEO 2.0 is, I think, largely about content and decent SEO work is about ensuring there is decent content at the site. Without decent content, the site’s relevance and resourcefulness is in question, and then I don’t see why it deserves to get good placement with the search engines. I want sites with good content.

]]> By: Endlich http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-40869 Endlich Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:01:58 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-40869 This is cutting edge, next level SEO Stuff right here. This is cutting edge, next level SEO Stuff right here.

]]> By: 15 diferenças: SEO versus SEO 2.0 « Ex Vertebrum http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-39986 15 diferenças: SEO versus SEO 2.0 « Ex Vertebrum Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:18:21 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-39986 [...] O post original, em inglês: http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences [...] […] O post original, em inglês: http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences […]

]]> By: Rafael Rez Oliveira http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-39520 Rafael Rez Oliveira Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:19:56 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-vs-seo-20-top-15-differences#comment-39520 Brilliant! Concise and clear. Brilliant!

Concise and clear.

]]>