Comments on: SEO 2.0 Reality Check: What’s True What Not? http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-20-reality-check-whats-true-what-not Helping people with blogs, social media & search Thu, 09 May 2013 16:25:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: TR http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-20-reality-check-whats-true-what-not#comment-110473 TR Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:01:15 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=498#comment-110473 Can anyone tell me how to get the most out of Mixx?

]]> By: Abhishek http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-20-reality-check-whats-true-what-not#comment-105502 Abhishek Fri, 29 May 2009 06:23:25 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=498#comment-105502 These are really useful tips..gonna bookmark the site for more information..using twitter and mixx both but not effectively i guess…getting the traffic mainly from google..have to use these services also..thnks for the post…

]]> By: Chris Suckling http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-20-reality-check-whats-true-what-not#comment-90375 Chris Suckling Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:24:30 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=498#comment-90375 I have to say, I have built a huge Success University business without a blog. Saying that, SEO 2.0 certainly seems to be the way to go :)

]]> By: anon http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-20-reality-check-whats-true-what-not#comment-88306 anon Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:35:34 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=498#comment-88306 I’m not sure about #2, there are tons of people without blogs making tons of money. #5 is good though, cant have everything focused in one area.

]]> By: Firdaus http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-20-reality-check-whats-true-what-not#comment-88283 Firdaus Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:03:19 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=498#comment-88283 wahaha… clever.

i think i’m ready to translate it (again) :)

]]> By: marketingmat http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-20-reality-check-whats-true-what-not#comment-87549 marketingmat Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:59:19 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=498#comment-87549 people are becoming a lot more careful now with the information they post in blogs so as not to be seen as spam. At least now if people dont want to get take off a comments section, they have to have read the actual article. A win win possibly :)

]]> By: onreact http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-20-reality-check-whats-true-what-not#comment-87044 onreact Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:07:34 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=498#comment-87044 Clement: Damn, what a misspelling, it must be “only those”.
It’s just a random one, I wasn’t into much research and installed this as a quick fix. Thus I did not recommend it yet. It’s Lucia’sLinkLove.

]]> By: Clement http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-20-reality-check-whats-true-what-not#comment-87022 Clement Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:28:06 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=498#comment-87022 Tad you write: “By now the “manual spam” has forced me to use another plugin offering real links to only does really participating”.

I am interested in this plugin. Can you share the link with me?

]]> By: onreact http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-20-reality-check-whats-true-what-not#comment-87011 onreact Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:04:18 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=498#comment-87011 marketingmat: Yeah, but initially some people assumed that you’d get mostly spam not real comments. It was 80/20 real vs spam to 50/50 lately due to me posting less often and being on more and more dofollow lists.

]]> By: marketingmat http://seo2.0.onreact.com/seo-20-reality-check-whats-true-what-not#comment-86971 marketingmat Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:04:15 +0000 http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=498#comment-86971 I guess its no suprise that dofollow links get a lot of comments ;)

]]>