sem-lymphocyte.jpg

SEM Lymphozyte. Source.

Google Trends is a wonderful tool to find out what the market really demands. I compared SEM to SEO demand to find out that the Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) industry is booming it seems.

The demand for SEM has skyrocketed recently.

It grew so much that it surpassed the number of queries for SEO everywhere, the US, UK and Germany where I work as a SEO consultant.

Then of course I compared the results for SEM in the three countries and respective local Google versions to make sure that Scanning Electron Microscopy is really that popular and not something quite negligible like Structural Equation Modeling or Search Engine Marketing is the real driving force of this boom.

As you might test yourself in Google.com Scanning Electron Microscopy is obviously the most important kind of SEM.

Viewed from the US 3 results deal with it, while Search Engine Marketing is found twice. Using Google.com from Germany you’ll only find one instance of Search Engine Marketing SEM as compared to 3 results for Scanning Electron Microscopy.

In Germany the people are kind of behind the times, they don’t deal much with Scanning Electron Microscopy yet so if I search Google.de for SEM I get mostly Search Engine Marketing related results.

So take a look at these charts comparing the US, UK and German demand for SEM:

US demand for SEM vs SEO:

seo-sem-google-trends-2007-2008-usa.png


UK demand for SEM vs SEO:

seo-sem-google-trends-2007-2008-uk.png



German demand for SEM vs SEO:

seo-sem-google-trends-2007-2008-germany.png


To be honest, if I’d be in Matt McGee’s shoes I’d put the SEM acronym in his title to rank higher for SEM. This way he even might be able to sell some Scanning Electron Microscopes.

You might reply that most people rather search for full phrases instead of acronyms, but they do not. You can check it yourself with Google Trends, they’re all by far less popular, even search marketing.

Related posts:

  1. 3 Search Marketing Magazines in Print
  2. How Can Websites about Boring Topics Succeed on Social Media?
  3. SEO Company, SEO and Search Engine Optimization Google Results Are a Disgrace
  4. Blog Suicide: Top 7 Title & Meta Tag Mistakes that Kill Your Blog
  5. Search: 8 Reasons Why Wolfram Alpha is a Waste of Time and no Threat to Google

June, 2008 | You can follow comments through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a comment, or trackback.

This thing has 4 Comments

  1. Federico Muñoa (3 comments.)
    Posted June 20, 2008 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    I love to work with Google trends too. I think is an excellent tool to describe searchers behaviour and to see new trends for searches.
    My last Google Trend study was the word: information vs info
    What I found out is that the word “info” has more searches through the years, while “information” stay the same.

  2. Matt McGee
    Posted June 21, 2008 at 2:19 am | Permalink

    Hehehehe. This kind of thing is exactly why I pulled the SEM from my blog name. :-)

  3. onreact (641 comments.)
    Posted June 23, 2008 at 8:53 am | Permalink

    Matt: So the traffic was not qualified? I can’t really believe that all these people searching for SEM are in dire need of Scanning Electron Microscopes.

  4. coetsee
    Posted December 27, 2009 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    I love to work with Google trends too. I think is an excellent tool to describe searchers behaviour and to see new trends for searches.
    My last Google Trend study was the word: information vs info
    What I found out is that the word “info” has more searches through the years, while “information” stay the same.

Post a Comment

Please mind the commenting netiquette, most notably:

  • A "name" is a real name or nick name, not a keyword! SEO Company is wrong. John Doe of Google is OK.
  • For the "website" URL: No deep links allowed unless it's your "about" page.
  • No extra signature allowed, one "website" link is enough.
  • No bot-like "Thank you" comments with no context or added value to the post.

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*