SEO BLOG

Search & Social Media Survival Guide

seo-google-search.png

These are the Google results for SEO I want to see, but Google SearchWiki doesn’t want me to keep.

Most of you have noticed by now, Google has introduced a new set of features to its search called SearchWiki. It’s more of a “Giggle” though as a blogger joked, a combination of Digg-like social news and Google. To me it rather resembles StumbleUpon though.

Anyways: I haven’t posted about it yet because it does not work for me here. I can see the buttons enabling you to

  • vote up/down
  • hide

results as well as the other options like

  • commenting results
  • adding results
  • seeing comments and edits by others

Whenever I change or add something I can’t save it and my changes won’t be displayed next time I visit the results inspite of them being recorder correctly, I can see them checking out my history of edits. I contacted the Google search feedback group like advised a by Google employee but nobody reacted yet, maybe they shouldn’t have get rid of 1/3 of their workforce.

Today I want to speak about what SearchWiki means for SEO 2.0 where SEO and social media converge. In case you are new on or to SEO 2.0 – it’s neither SEO nor social media marketing while entailing some elements of both or at least using the same media, both social and search. So don’t mistake SEO and SEO 2.0 and complain before checking out my older articles on SEO 2.0

OK, as the headline already suggests: SearchWiki is great, it’s terrific for SEO 2.0!

For a long time the SEO 2.0 blog you read now did not show up in Google for any significant search queries due to the methods Google uses to rank sites.

Google prefers old sites and Google needs you to mention keywords all over the place. You need keywords in the title, headline, text, anchor text of internal and external links etc. So basically you have to tweak your website until it looks like crap.

When I started SEO 2.0 I decided to ignore Google and to concentrate on social media plus other websites and blogs as direct traffic sources. I succeeded very quickly and my blog grew to instant popularity thanks to StumbleUpon, Sphinn and other bloggers. Still Google refused to take notice of this.

Google did not even manage to notice that this site is a blog until I decided to tell him by writing a huge “SEO BLOG” in the headline and title and from then on other people told him over and over. So now the Google algorithm finally got it. 15 months later Google has acknowledged my success.

Now, with SearchWiki people get the power back that Google has taken away from them. Now they can customize their own search results. Now who would do that in the first place? The answer is simple:

  1. Internet pros
  2. social media power users
  3. early adopters
  4. people who really care about their topics of interest
  5. experts

Internet pros or people who are at home on the Web will use it to make their virtual home a better place. They will hide all the useless search results for newbies or the outdated ones.

Social media powers users who grew up on social news and social bookmarking will readily embrace another social aspect of the Web. They will vote up the best sites they already new before.

Early adopters will try the new features just for the sake of their novelty, they will play around and discover new uses for them. Some of them will come up with things nobody, even Google, though of.

People who really care for their topics of interest will customize their results in a way where thy can access the best resources directly from page 1 results on Google.

Experts on any subject be it SEO or rocket science will quickly root out the low quality results and add more expert resources to Google. Sooner or later you’ll be able to subscribe to search results managed by others.

All of these people doing what they do by their own motivation are exactly the people who are the driving force of SEO 2.0 Right now they already vote on StumbleUpon, Sphinn or any other social site but in future they’ll do it on Google directly.

The SEO 2.0 blog would have never succeeded in a Web 1.0 environment where I would be forced to wait a year or longer until the bots finally get message. With SearchWiki the people who

  1. have experience
  2. socialize
  3. try out new things
  4. care
  5. have expertise

decide what’s worth it and what not. Bots can’t do that, people can. In fact SearchWiki is a direct competitor of StumbleUpon. They suggest web pages and you have to judge them.

Google will sooner or later improve the results with the user feedback it will get directly for non SearchWiki users too. So no longer will quick link baity SEO 1.0 be enough to rule the search results, you’ll need people who know you and who will recognize you in the search results.

People like SEO 1.0 Jason Calacanis who get thousands of links by tricking others into linking to them will get nuked from the search results.

Btw. Why did I customize the results for SEO not those for SEO 2.0? I’m quite satisfied with most of them. Btw. I’m the source number one for SEO 2.0, I rarely search for other sources ;-)

Related posts:

  1. Google +1: The New SearchWiki?
  2. Top 10 Reasons Why Great Content Fails on Social Media
  3. Great Niche Social News Sites for Bloggers, Designers and Internet Entrepreneurs
  4. 7 Ways Self Submission Hurts Yourself on Social Media
  5. 10 Habits of Highly Efficient Social Media Power Users

November 26, 2008 | You can follow comments through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a comment, or trackback.

Need help? Consider a world class blog & SEO consultation by the author of SEO 2.0, Tad Chef. For full fledged SEO services like ongoing link building, contact my partners from SEO.com or look up my directory of SEO service providers and checkout reputable companies like Datadial or Redfly.

Already an SEO? Consider applying to be added to my exclusive SEO agency directory. Only selected companies get included. Find out whether you are eligible to submit your site.

This thing has 8 Comments

  1. Posted November 26, 2008 at 18:41 | Permalink

    I love new Google SearchWiki, it definitely is making great strides in the right direction and I look forward to seeing what it will become capable of. I do recommend that they rip off Wikipedia’s content publishing admin rules to some extent though, otherwise a lot of abuse will take place. Looking forward to seeing what happens though :)

  2. Posted November 26, 2008 at 23:47 | Permalink

    Yeah Stuart, the idea rocks. It’s in the early stages though and they’ll have to improve it.

    I thought they’d rather buy StumbleUpon than implementing something themselves but they did and this time they’re keen on making main stream unlike with Google Bookmarks and the likes.

  3. Posted November 27, 2008 at 12:16 | Permalink

    Hi, the link that belongs to “tricking others into linking to them” doesn’t work. I’d be interested.

  4. Posted November 27, 2008 at 14:11 | Permalink

    rp: You rascal! I fixed it.

  5. Posted December 1, 2008 at 12:26 | Permalink

    I do like how the Wiki has a line that says: “6 others found this result useful”.

    In the short term, I don’t think this will really affect rankings. But as the adaptor crowd move from the niche “pro” users, it should have a positive impact on the quality of results.

  6. Krisna
    Posted December 1, 2008 at 14:16 | Permalink

    But I couldn’t login…Its not working !!

  7. Posted January 5, 2009 at 17:47 | Permalink

    I personally don’t like Google’s SearchWiki much. I’m always on the lookout for new sites (new info) related to my search queries and don’t like that any website I previously tagged (maybe for other keywords) has to always show on top.

    Haha, ok I stop tagging .. but still!

  8. Posted February 2, 2009 at 11:11 | Permalink

    I guess i am interested in if peoples choices have an effect on page ranking. When i read the link to search wiki, it said that the results are personal to the individual account. So, does google take your preferences into account or not i wonder when looking at page ranking?

Post a Comment

Please mind the commenting netiquette, most notably:

  • A "name" is a real name or nick name, not a keyword! SEO Company is wrong. John Doe of Google is OK.
  • For the "website" URL: No deep links allowed unless it's your "about" page.
  • No extra signature allowed, one "website" link is enough.
  • No bot-like "Thank you" comments with no context or added value to the post.

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*