Comments on: Netscape.com Does Not Work

By: seoalligator

seoalligator — Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:24:00 +0000

a gree to sergey - netscape not give visitors…

By: sergey

sergey — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:34:58 +0000

Yes, I fully agree with you. Netscape.com not give visitors to site. And it is very strange.

By: web hosting

web hosting — Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:42:30 +0000

from netscape.com you can get high-PR link (even PR6)!

By: SEO 2.0 | How Blogging Made Me Famous in Less Than 3 Weeks

SEO 2.0 | How Blogging Made Me Famous in Less Than 3 Weeks — Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:51:56 +0000

[…] submissions from different sources to Netscape.com failed miserably to make the front […]

By: SEO 2.0 | Does Netscape.com Delete Most of it’s Submisssions?

SEO 2.0 | Does Netscape.com Delete Most of it’s Submisssions? — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:30:49 +0000

[…] a week ago I complained about Netscape.com not working out for me in any way almost everybody ignored me. Those that […]

By: onreact

onreact — Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:10:17 +0000

fantomaster, thank you for your comment. Of course you can argue that I should give a lot first before receiving anything back. It’s nonetheless very different compared to most other social news sites. A story always gets some votes on social news sites that have enough active visitors. Someone at Digg even submitted my Digg-article and it got 21 votes although it was rather concise.
If Netsacpe is just about vote swap it fails in my eyes. In this light Digg, which has many disadvantages, is nevertheless the winner of those two.

By: fantomaster

fantomaster — Sat, 28 Jul 2007 16:37:10 +0000

I really don’t dig (pun intended) your problem - if you’re that experienced in working social networks, shouldn’t it be a given that it’s just another case of “give before you take”?

We’ve tested Netscape a bit in the past 6 weeks or so with pretty good results considering. Of course, we don’t simply submit a story and wait for the votes to come. First, vote for plenty of others, add them as friends and then promote your own stuff.
Not everyone will reciprocate the favor but very many will. If someone’s positively and persistently not interested in your stuff while blithely gobbling your votes, you can always drop them and move on.

By: onreact

onreact — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:39:32 +0000

I did not talk about “these sites”. I know perfectly well how social news sites work. Those who have a community at least make some people check your articles. On Netscape.com 5 articles were completely ignored. Some of those were frontpage news elsewhere, on sites that seemingly have much less traffic.

By: kris

kris — Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:00:04 +0000

These sites do work, as long as you adapt to the way you need to , in order to make them work for you . That is what web 2.0 is about, users change the internet , if you snooze you loose .