Mob vs Smart Mob: 7 Reasons Why StumbleUpon Traffic Is the Best Social Media Traffic

Do you think Digg and Reddit or Twitter and Facebook are the places to go nowadays? Never used StumbleUpon until now?
You should try StumbleUpon, both as a user and a webmaster.
- Users get highly relevant content that matches their preferences, that's the way of social browsing.
- Webmasters get substantial, steady and recurring traffic.
Especially new and small non-profit blogs like this one can get a regular, even daily traffic boost. That's not all though to say about StumbleUpon, it's not just any traffic, it's the best and most targeted traffic you can get from social media.
Let me present 7 reasons why StumbleUpon traffic is the best traffic compared to other social sites:
- It's very targeted! StumbleUpon is like channel surfing the Web. The users subscribe to certain topics. So people already interested in your topic stumble upon your site or blog. Unless of course someone adds your post to the wrong category. For instance this post here is fitting for the SEO, marketing and StumbleUpon categories not technology or computers.
- New visitors: StumbleUpon traffic means over 95% new visitors, new visitors that are really interested in your topic not just any visitors. On Twitter or Facebook mostly people you already know click the links.
- Recurring: This post is the best example. It has been written originally in 2007 and it still gets traffic from StumbleUpon after all these years. After all it's still valid. Digg, Reddit, Twitter and Facebook traffic happens once and in most cases never again.
- Steady: There is no server outage caused by StumbleUpon! Digg can mess up your server, cost you much money and damage your reputation. StumbleUpon traffic comes in steadily with occasional recurring bursts. SEO 2.0 has been stumbled numerous times by now, almost all articles have been submitted by users not myself. Some have been stumbled repeatedly like this particular post. It means that every time a user decides to "like" this post you get a burst of traffic, which in many cases amounts to approx. 100 visitors. This is not much you might argue, but for a new blog like mine that had less 100 visitors daily without social media it's substantial.
- Less flames: Digg and Reddit users hate you for no apparent reason because those services force topics upon people whereas StumbleUpon mostly sends you those who like your subject matter anyways. I noticed that I was dugg by the stupid flame comments "you suck on the internet" on my post. Most StumbleUpon users in contrast behave like surprise guests because they stumbled into your party in a way. So they don't offend you. On a side note: I was submitted to Reddit and was buried in an instant, probably for being an SEO.
- International: While Digg is predominantly white, middle class Americans and Europeans StumbleUpon even brought me some of the rare users from Africa. SU has a more varied international user base.
- Instant: While new blogs and sites won't get any significant traffic from Google and it takes a while to get traction on Twitter and Facebook StumbleUpon in contrast can jump start your blog. A complete stranger is enough. SU is not about getting friends. I wasn't an SU user myself by that time. My blog was stumbled on day two of SEO 2.0 at a time where Google sent 2 visitors per day. The first significant traffic from Google began to pour in after two weeks but still amounted to 20 - 30 visits. After a month I received more traffic from StumbleUpon alone than from Google's organic search.
Conclusion: If you set up a new blog or site that targets a niche, you are on shared hosting and you do not want your hosting bill to skyrocket or you are non-profit anyways try to target the StumbleUpon audience and skip the "you suck on the internet" mobs of Digg and Reddit. Then make the people who stumble your stuff friends you on Twitter and Facebook.
StumbleUpon does not allow self-submission, friend votes do not count on SU and the system does not support social networking. So you better don't engage on SU as a webmaster. Focus on attracting existing StumbleUpon users.
Also do not concentrate on Google. Google does not send any significant traffic to new sites to prevent spam. So only older authority sites can built upon organic Google traffic.
In case you rely on commercial success concentrate on StumbleUpon by using the Su.pr URL shortener first. This way SU users are more likely to find your content.
Then other social media will follow. By then you can afford the 300$ hosting bill and your success makes you immune against flame comments of the mob.
Instead of the mob following the lowest common denominator choose the smart mob of StumbleUpon and other social browsing services.
Last updated: August 14th, 2010.




I’m a big fan of stumble upon traffic. You will find that the more you get involved the more you can leverage
[...] Original post by onreact [...]
I was also pretty surprised to find that SU traffic had such an impressively low bounce rate. I think it is, without a doubt, the most underrated of all the social media services. To this date most of my traffic has come from StumbleUpon!
I get StumpleUpon traffic all the time and always considered it to be very low quality. Might depend on your niche.
[...] before publishing my post hailing StumbleUpon as the best traffic source in the world, 2 of my posts got stumbled in the meantime. So I decided to look closer at [...]
Nice to see I wasn’t the only one who noticed the low bounce rate. Great point for new blogs regarding Google vs. StumbleUpon.
Thanks Tadeusz – I master a few sites and’ve been on StumbleUpon for some time, so I’ve noticed some of what you’ve described.
All my sites are on LAMP platforms and using AWStats I’d gained the impression that SU traffic’s more fickle than other forms, since average visit duration seems to fall during a SU spurt.
Can you recommend a LAMP-based AWStats alternative to improve my perspective?
From my experience, I’d add is that, if your page is geo-specific, add geographical SU-tags on your initial SU review. The USA bias on SU traffic is very strong, if you’re not especially seeking USA traffic, it’s a good idea to do something positive about it.
Also, a small point, currently, SU has a high density of Mozilla/Firefox users – so if you’re getting a lot of SU traffic, remember your browser-type stat’s are skewed.
SU is great. One of the reasons for such low bounce rates is: they don’t show you a list of 100 links to visit.
Where as every time you visit other social websites like digg and reddit – there are a 100 links you want to go through. You enter in a race against new content. And thus visit more websites, but spend very little time on each of those websites.
SU is very good for traffic boost. Just don’t use it to much or your site will get banned from it.
Ian, thank you for voicing your interesting observations. You can try TraceWatch if you prefer LAMP but I use Google Analytics as I am lazy.
The vsist duration is a little lower than that of regular users or specific searches but still substantailly higher than not targeted traffic.
The US bias is less visible than on Digg in my opinion.
Ankesh: Good point, it’s about attention and focus.
Carl: Let others stumble you, just create compelling content that fits the interest of stumblers. SEO 2.0 and especially SMO is not about messing with a system. It’s about using it in the best possible way.
[...] Sunday I was stumbled for real and ended of on top of the Internet section of StumbleUpon. That meant 2000 visitors just from SU. [...]
Plus, Digg is mainly based off of popularity so if no one popular likes your page no one else will go.
In SU we don’t get a choice.
For social traffic, I haven’t found anything that brings a more consistent flow. StumbleUpon is great.
It’s all true I tell you. It is also cool. No silly users dumping crap text in the comments for me to go delete just people that liked it and those that left. The trouble is my server can not keep up with it. (poor server though). I read one research pge that the avergae age of the SU top 100 uses was 35! Which suggests that Stumble appeals to those with a brain (unlike…).
Excellent article and insights on the typical SU user and the power of that social networking site to drive traffic.
[...] SEO 2.0 – 7 Reasons Why StumbleUpon Traffic Is the Best on the Planet This article actually provides 7 reasons why it is advantageous to use StumbleUpon. Get the facts [...]
Great post I’m going to look into stumbledupon. Maybe even stop using digg so much.
[...] initially complete strangers would stumble me and I would receive a small wave of traffic each time after some weeks Lyndon of Cornwall SEO stumbled me a started the first avalanche that brought me [...]
[...] MyFreeImplants pages a thumbs up, it will in turn bring more people to the site. And it brings high quality traffic, meaning there is a high probability the new visitors will sign up for an account, which is a very [...]
[...] you might have noticed: I’m not entirely through with StumbleUpon although I have been attacked there repeatedly and almost blocked for no apparent reason besides [...]
I’d agree with your points, particularly bounce rate. I’m starting to love SU, both as a user and a blogger, driving traffic to my blog. After all…it’s how I found this post!
Best,
[...] Get social on StumbleUpon, it brings huge targeted traffic if you do it [...]
[...] 3. 7 Reasons Why StumbleUpon Traffic is the Best on the Planet [...]
[...] Mob vs Smart Mob: 7 Reasons Why StumbleUpon Traffic Is the Best on the Planet by Tad Chef Do you think Digg or Reddit is the place to go nowadays? Never used StumbleUpon until now? You should, both as a user and a webmaster. Users get highly relevant content that matches their preferences, that’s the way of social browsing. [...]
stumble upon traffic is great, but I can see it being abused by some people. on blogcatalog there are people who ask for stumbles from other bloggers just to generate more traffic. If people just stumble a blog or website without actually reviewing it, this can hurt the way that stumble upon (and social bookmarking) works. if enough people do it, it could become disastrous. but I agree, stumbleupon is great!! I just don’t want to see it getting abused
turtie, you are right that with success every platform also faces abuse. fortunately SU has some basic and advanced checks and balances to render those abuse attempts useless.
In fact a blog like mine that is successful on SU without any asking for votes is the proof that with the current SU ranking those sites get popular which truly deserve it.
In contrast first generation social sites like Digg with very plain ways of voting up or down are prone to fail.
Great article and tips on StumbleUpon. I have been get a lot of traffic for my arcade site from there. Not much from Google so far
[...] Mob vs Smart Mob: 7 Reasons Why StumbleUpon Traffic Is the Best on the Planet by Tad Chef Do you think Digg or Reddit is the place to go nowadays? Never used StumbleUpon until now? You should, both as a user and a webmaster. Users get highly relevant content that matches their preferences, that’s the way of social browsing. [...]
[...] 7 Reasons Why StumbleUpon Traffic is the Best on the Planet [...]
[...] you how many people stayed at the site, or clicked off it right away (in less than 5 seconds). In SEO 2.0, they noticed a bounce rate of [...]
Stumbleupon sucks. The traffic they send you is worthless. People just sit there clicking stumble.
[...] “StumbleUpon is the best traffic in the world” thing is over. StumbleUpon stopped sending [...]
[...] StumbleUpon traffic is not really reliable and I strongly advise you not to depend on it for your blog StumbleUpon is [...]
[...] Mob vs Smart Mob: 7 Reasons Why StumbleUpon Traffic Is the Best on the Planet [...]
I am sorry but I am not agreeing with you, what are you saying is a BIG LIE!! You might not approve this comment, but at least you will read it. Stumbleupon has the higher bounce rates. Search engine traffic has the best bounce rates. I have seen it!!!!!
Stumbleupon is the worst source of traffic ever.
Hey Daniel. It’s not a “lie”. This is just a 2 years old article. The situation has changed a few times since then.