<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matt Cutts Acknowledges SEO 2.0 Tactic of Linking Out as Ranking Factor (Nofollow is Dead)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 21:12:17 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: george@seotalk.gr</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-151178</link>
		<dc:creator>george@seotalk.gr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=717#comment-151178</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a pretty interesting article

I will have to do my own tests now and see the results


Let&#039;s see :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a pretty interesting article</p>
<p>I will have to do my own tests now and see the results</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ PowerPoker Review</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-143761</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ PowerPoker Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=717#comment-143761</guid>
		<description>Interesting article.  Did not know that having quality outbound links would help with google page ranking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.  Did not know that having quality outbound links would help with google page ranking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-138520</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=717#comment-138520</guid>
		<description>Best post I&#039;ve read in the past two weeks and best news this week!

I&#039;m a true believer that sistematically linking out to other topic related website with dofollow links improves your website&#039;s credibility in SE&#039;s eyes.

Outbound links are avoided for two main reasons, namely:

1. fear of loosing pagerank;

2. fear of becoming an overnight depositar of a tone of reciprocal links due to signes of appreciation from the linked-to websites.

To further incline the balace in favor to dofollow outbound links, consider the fact that Google doesn&#039;t assign much trust to websites that have a consistent portfolio of nofollow outbound links and, I my opinion, for good reason.

Recently I made a post on my blog where I present some of the benefits your site will enjoy from consistently linking out to related quality content resources in your niche market. For those interested, here&#039;s the link:

http://trafficcpanel.com/892/outbound-linking-cashing-in-on-seo-tactics-that-others-fear/

Hope it enriches your SEO perspective!

Cheers,
Cristian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best post I&#8217;ve read in the past two weeks and best news this week!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a true believer that sistematically linking out to other topic related website with dofollow links improves your website&#8217;s credibility in SE&#8217;s eyes.</p>
<p>Outbound links are avoided for two main reasons, namely:</p>
<p>1. fear of loosing pagerank;</p>
<p>2. fear of becoming an overnight depositar of a tone of reciprocal links due to signes of appreciation from the linked-to websites.</p>
<p>To further incline the balace in favor to dofollow outbound links, consider the fact that Google doesn&#8217;t assign much trust to websites that have a consistent portfolio of nofollow outbound links and, I my opinion, for good reason.</p>
<p>Recently I made a post on my blog where I present some of the benefits your site will enjoy from consistently linking out to related quality content resources in your niche market. For those interested, here&#8217;s the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://trafficcpanel.com/892/outbound-linking-cashing-in-on-seo-tactics-that-others-fear/">http://trafficcpanel.com/892/outbound-linking-cashing-in-on-seo-tactics-that-others-fear/</a></p>
<p>Hope it enriches your SEO perspective!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Cristian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Gregory</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-128837</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=717#comment-128837</guid>
		<description>Very glad I discovered this site today - definately going into the bookmarks!
What I don&#039;t understand is whether it&#039;s better to have reciprocal links, or worse?
A reciprocal link implies that it might be a link exchange, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very glad I discovered this site today &#8211; definately going into the bookmarks!<br />
What I don&#8217;t understand is whether it&#8217;s better to have reciprocal links, or worse?<br />
A reciprocal link implies that it might be a link exchange, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve of scrabblecheat.com</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-125623</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve of scrabblecheat.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 21:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=717#comment-125623</guid>
		<description>The smart people I talked to said link everywhere. First you look like a normal user and of course no follow will eventually die.  I&#039;ve noticed many blogs removing do follow in the last six months. This is the best news I have heard all year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The smart people I talked to said link everywhere. First you look like a normal user and of course no follow will eventually die.  I&#8217;ve noticed many blogs removing do follow in the last six months. This is the best news I have heard all year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Partner</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-123030</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Partner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 03:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=717#comment-123030</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to see Google finally give credit where credit&#039;s due. Thank you for referencing SEO 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see Google finally give credit where credit&#8217;s due. Thank you for referencing SEO 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-119834</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=717#comment-119834</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s true no follow is dead, but Mutt Cutt want blogger and webmasters to not set no follow tags</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true no follow is dead, but Mutt Cutt want blogger and webmasters to not set no follow tags</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-119717</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=717#comment-119717</guid>
		<description>An excellent post, I never really considered linking out, I may add a few links to authority sites and see what happens :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent post, I never really considered linking out, I may add a few links to authority sites and see what happens :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Richey</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-118882</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Richey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=717#comment-118882</guid>
		<description>This is such a heated topic right now, but I came across your post and it gave me some much needed clarity with the entire thing.

I&#039;ve been analyzing links for months, finding that every backlink checker (including Yahoo! Site Explorer, Google&#039;s link: command and Market Samurai) does indeed count links to my websites, even when they have the nofollow tag.

I had been curious about this for a long time, considering the way everyone described it&#039;s nature (i.e. not passing PR), why this was happening.

Now, it all makes sense...

Thanks for the post!
Kyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a heated topic right now, but I came across your post and it gave me some much needed clarity with the entire thing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been analyzing links for months, finding that every backlink checker (including Yahoo! Site Explorer, Google&#8217;s link: command and Market Samurai) does indeed count links to my websites, even when they have the nofollow tag.</p>
<p>I had been curious about this for a long time, considering the way everyone described it&#8217;s nature (i.e. not passing PR), why this was happening.</p>
<p>Now, it all makes sense&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for the post!<br />
Kyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arinsblogcdyt</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/matt-cutts-acknowledges-seo-20-tactic-of-linking-out-as-ranking-factor-nofollow-is-dead/comment-page-1#comment-118507</link>
		<dc:creator>arinsblogcdyt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=717#comment-118507</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a shocking news. Because of this new policy the blog which get more comments will be in trouble. I think it&#039;s better to do all links dofollow. Of course blog owner has to fight against spammer. But I did not realized much that linking out to a quality site can improve ranking. 
Thanks for sharing the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a shocking news. Because of this new policy the blog which get more comments will be in trouble. I think it&#8217;s better to do all links dofollow. Of course blog owner has to fight against spammer. But I did not realized much that linking out to a quality site can improve ranking.<br />
Thanks for sharing the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.395 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-02 03:01:59 -->
