<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Get Any Story Buried on Digg</title>
	<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: onreact</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-39538</link>
		<author>onreact</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-39538</guid>
		<description>Vertaling: Yes, there are. No way of going frontpage with writing about "SEO". Unless you call Apple iPod instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vertaling: Yes, there are. No way of going frontpage with writing about &#8220;SEO&#8221;. Unless you call Apple iPod instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vertaling</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-39522</link>
		<author>Vertaling</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-39522</guid>
		<description>What if you advertise the SEO in a different way?

Most polular Digg articles are following the same formula: 

Top ten things that will get you something!
Six new ways to get exactly what you want!

Maybe something along the line of 'Top ten reasons how SEO can help your website' will be more effective? Or are they really that much against SEO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you advertise the SEO in a different way?</p>
<p>Most polular Digg articles are following the same formula: </p>
<p>Top ten things that will get you something!<br />
Six new ways to get exactly what you want!</p>
<p>Maybe something along the line of &#8216;Top ten reasons how SEO can help your website&#8217; will be more effective? Or are they really that much against SEO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: homegirl</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-37643</link>
		<author>homegirl</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-37643</guid>
		<description>i think you all are crazy and should just eat the apple -lol-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think you all are crazy and should just eat the apple -lol-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO 2.0 &#124; 7 Completely Insane Black Hat SEO 2.0 Methods</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-34202</link>
		<author>SEO 2.0 &#124; 7 Completely Insane Black Hat SEO 2.0 Methods</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 13:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-34202</guid>
		<description>[...] we all know all SEO is bullshit, evil and spam. So as a SEO 2.0 evangelist I recently thought about some black hat SEO 2.0 methods for an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] we all know all SEO is bullshit, evil and spam. So as a SEO 2.0 evangelist I recently thought about some black hat SEO 2.0 methods for an [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO 2.0 &#124; Top 10 Reasons Why Great Content Fails on Social Media</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-32547</link>
		<author>SEO 2.0 &#124; Top 10 Reasons Why Great Content Fails on Social Media</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 20:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-32547</guid>
		<description>[...] developers. Now the submission to Digg included the word &#8220;SEO&#8221; instead which equals to self-annihilation on Digg. No story that contains &#8220;SEO&#8221; in its title makes the Digg front page. So study your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] developers. Now the submission to Digg included the word &#8220;SEO&#8221; instead which equals to self-annihilation on Digg. No story that contains &#8220;SEO&#8221; in its title makes the Digg front page. So study your [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ @ Fermentarium</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-32293</link>
		<author>DJ @ Fermentarium</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-32293</guid>
		<description>I've noticed this too.  It doesn't matter if the story is interesting or not, if it doesn't fall into an officially sanctioned Digg niche, it won't fly.  That's why I've started using sites like Mixx.  Most of my blog stuff is about beer and homebrewing, so luckily someone created a Digg-like site for beer (BrewPoll).  Is that what needs to happen for other niches?  Create your own Digg or perish?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed this too.  It doesn&#8217;t matter if the story is interesting or not, if it doesn&#8217;t fall into an officially sanctioned Digg niche, it won&#8217;t fly.  That&#8217;s why I&#8217;ve started using sites like Mixx.  Most of my blog stuff is about beer and homebrewing, so luckily someone created a Digg-like site for beer (BrewPoll).  Is that what needs to happen for other niches?  Create your own Digg or perish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumesh</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-32076</link>
		<author>Sumesh</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-32076</guid>
		<description>Spot on ^^

I've written two posts about GIMP and one about Apple, and both got dugg well.

Then I wrote a useful (and not necessarily Digg-bait) post about useful free substitutes to paid software, it got 61 diggs, was in Hot in software sidebar section and then just BAM! it disappears.

Digg is for Apple/Linux/gadgets/weird stuff, and anything else will be buried or removed by Digg moderators.

I am really sick of their hypocrisy too - they do not acknowledge presence of moderators or auto-bury list, yet there's enough proof for both.

I'll be baiting Digg again - but unlike others, my hope is that I'll get new readers so that I can get down to writing proper content again (many of my friends have grown readership with Digg software section), but I think SU, Delicious and Mixx are much better sources of quality traffic.

Looking forward to the day Digg falls under its own weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on ^^</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written two posts about GIMP and one about Apple, and both got dugg well.</p>
<p>Then I wrote a useful (and not necessarily Digg-bait) post about useful free substitutes to paid software, it got 61 diggs, was in Hot in software sidebar section and then just BAM! it disappears.</p>
<p>Digg is for Apple/Linux/gadgets/weird stuff, and anything else will be buried or removed by Digg moderators.</p>
<p>I am really sick of their hypocrisy too - they do not acknowledge presence of moderators or auto-bury list, yet there&#8217;s enough proof for both.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be baiting Digg again - but unlike others, my hope is that I&#8217;ll get new readers so that I can get down to writing proper content again (many of my friends have grown readership with Digg software section), but I think SU, Delicious and Mixx are much better sources of quality traffic.</p>
<p>Looking forward to the day Digg falls under its own weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SilentJay74</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-32061</link>
		<author>SilentJay74</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-32061</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Tad Good point my man! I see what you mean.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tad Good point my man! I see what you mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Egan</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-32009</link>
		<author>Peter Egan</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 09:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-32009</guid>
		<description>"I think Digg is worth a pile of shit..."

This is offensive, and an insult to all the hard-working cattle farmers who supply the world with the rich, organic compost needed to fertilize the soil we grow out fuel... er, food in.

On a more serious note, I wonder what would happen if you were to submit a story to Digg with the following title: "Ron Paul uses iPod to listen to podcasts about SEO techniques".

This would actually make for a very interesting experiment.

Anyway, I enjoyed the article, and I share many of the same sentiments about Digg as you have expressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think Digg is worth a pile of shit&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>This is offensive, and an insult to all the hard-working cattle farmers who supply the world with the rich, organic compost needed to fertilize the soil we grow out fuel&#8230; er, food in.</p>
<p>On a more serious note, I wonder what would happen if you were to submit a story to Digg with the following title: &#8220;Ron Paul uses iPod to listen to podcasts about SEO techniques&#8221;.</p>
<p>This would actually make for a very interesting experiment.</p>
<p>Anyway, I enjoyed the article, and I share many of the same sentiments about Digg as you have expressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomb</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-31945</link>
		<author>tomb</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 04:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/how-to-get-any-story-buried-on-digg#comment-31945</guid>
		<description>So you are going to tell me that mixx isn't where I can find my latest dose of anti-digg propoganda? Look at these comments, keep it up guys I can't wait for the hate to consume mixx too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you are going to tell me that mixx isn&#8217;t where I can find my latest dose of anti-digg propoganda? Look at these comments, keep it up guys I can&#8217;t wait for the hate to consume mixx too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
