<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confidential: 22 Google Laws Leaked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked</link>
	<description>Search &#38; Social Media Survival Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Grossett</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-212194</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Grossett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-212194</guid>
		<description>Brilliant article quite funny to - whilst realistic - number 17 &amp; 22 are facts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant article quite funny to &#8211; whilst realistic &#8211; number 17 &amp; 22 are facts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reza</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-179641</link>
		<dc:creator>Reza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 00:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-179641</guid>
		<description>I would not ever comment on Google&#039;s &quot;evil&quot; nature or intentions.  They are the only game in town, and thats the truth.  Google can single handedly put an organization out of business, or in the alternative, make them wealthy overnight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not ever comment on Google&#8217;s &#8220;evil&#8221; nature or intentions.  They are the only game in town, and thats the truth.  Google can single handedly put an organization out of business, or in the alternative, make them wealthy overnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-166492</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 01:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-166492</guid>
		<description>Great stuff. # 17 is classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff. # 17 is classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Smith</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-161301</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-161301</guid>
		<description>Google isn’t evil yet. It could become evil, but it isn’t at this moment. If you discredit yourself now with stupid things like this, you’ll be ignored if/when they really do turn evil, and that would be a shame. Boy who cried wolf, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google isn’t evil yet. It could become evil, but it isn’t at this moment. If you discredit yourself now with stupid things like this, you’ll be ignored if/when they really do turn evil, and that would be a shame. Boy who cried wolf, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-80589</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-80589</guid>
		<description>Wow, interesting post.  Some of the information sharing does bug me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, interesting post.  Some of the information sharing does bug me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-78580</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-78580</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey leave Google alone. . . or they will put you out of business.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey leave Google alone. . . or they will put you out of business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The First 4 of ‘7 Steps in Courting Google’ &#124; SMF - Social Media Consultant</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-126180</link>
		<dc:creator>The First 4 of ‘7 Steps in Courting Google’ &#124; SMF - Social Media Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-126180</guid>
		<description>[...] don&#8217;t forget humour in all of these points before the first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] don&#8217;t forget humour in all of these points before the first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The First 4 of &#8216;7 Steps in Courting Google&#8217; &#124; On.eTi.me</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-68503</link>
		<dc:creator>The First 4 of &#8216;7 Steps in Courting Google&#8217; &#124; On.eTi.me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-68503</guid>
		<description>[...] don&#8217;t forget humour in all of these points before the first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] don&#8217;t forget humour in all of these points before the first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-50583</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-50583</guid>
		<description>#14 is retarded. This doesn&#039;t happen because of Google being awkward, it happens because people manipulate the SERPs by overusing certain techniques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#14 is retarded. This doesn&#8217;t happen because of Google being awkward, it happens because people manipulate the SERPs by overusing certain techniques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yossarian</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-45661</link>
		<dc:creator>Yossarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/confidential-22-google-laws-leaked#comment-45661</guid>
		<description>Ah just came across this article. Immense. Unfortunatly it is all so true :( Every week a see more and more weird behaviour from Google. I recently got a couple of websites penalised for questionable link building. Yes I know, cut my hands off I am evil. Anyway looking at the state of the SERPs it just takes the piss how many people completely take the piss and get away with it. One example was a big wordpress sponsor, he was penalised, got back in then just started up again. No issues since! Unfortunatly the opposite seems to happen to quite a lot of people and they get penalties for hardly anything. I sometimes think that the whole identifying spam thing is no where near as intelligent as Google tries and make out. They just seem to penaluse a bunch of people and hope the fear of penalties makes people conform to their guidelines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah just came across this article. Immense. Unfortunatly it is all so true :( Every week a see more and more weird behaviour from Google. I recently got a couple of websites penalised for questionable link building. Yes I know, cut my hands off I am evil. Anyway looking at the state of the SERPs it just takes the piss how many people completely take the piss and get away with it. One example was a big wordpress sponsor, he was penalised, got back in then just started up again. No issues since! Unfortunatly the opposite seems to happen to quite a lot of people and they get penalties for hardly anything. I sometimes think that the whole identifying spam thing is no where near as intelligent as Google tries and make out. They just seem to penaluse a bunch of people and hope the fear of penalties makes people conform to their guidelines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

