<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Authority and Trustrank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seo2.0.onreact.com/authority-and-trustrank/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/authority-and-trustrank</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:44:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr Woc</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/authority-and-trustrank/comment-page-1#comment-148997</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Woc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=811#comment-148997</guid>
		<description>Hi there 

Those do make sense, not really sure why everyone is obsessed with domain age on the comments mind, not like it something you can change !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there </p>
<p>Those do make sense, not really sure why everyone is obsessed with domain age on the comments mind, not like it something you can change !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew from OME</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/authority-and-trustrank/comment-page-1#comment-143280</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew from OME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=811#comment-143280</guid>
		<description>Authority and Trust is an excellent way of filtering out sites that rank from pure link volume. Thus this forces websites to actually provide real valuable content in order for Trusted sites to link to them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Authority and Trust is an excellent way of filtering out sites that rank from pure link volume. Thus this forces websites to actually provide real valuable content in order for Trusted sites to link to them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/authority-and-trustrank/comment-page-1#comment-138786</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=811#comment-138786</guid>
		<description>Domain age is important but only if the domain is older than say 5 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domain age is important but only if the domain is older than say 5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/authority-and-trustrank/comment-page-1#comment-132679</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=811#comment-132679</guid>
		<description>I agree that a domain&#039;s age is important.  However, I feel there&#039;s a very important factor that most SEOs don&#039;t take into account: age of a backlink.  Through me SEO adventures, I have found that the longer a backlink is in place, the more valuable it seems to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that a domain&#8217;s age is important.  However, I feel there&#8217;s a very important factor that most SEOs don&#8217;t take into account: age of a backlink.  Through me SEO adventures, I have found that the longer a backlink is in place, the more valuable it seems to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sydney Monis</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/authority-and-trustrank/comment-page-1#comment-123222</link>
		<dc:creator>Sydney Monis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=811#comment-123222</guid>
		<description>I guess domain age, relevant high quality backlinks ar the two things that can be monitored by an algorithm better. For me, i&#039;d say, domain age counts the most. The worst part about budding SEOs is that they may achieve anything but not Age, hence it should be an original factor to rank and evaluate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess domain age, relevant high quality backlinks ar the two things that can be monitored by an algorithm better. For me, i&#8217;d say, domain age counts the most. The worst part about budding SEOs is that they may achieve anything but not Age, hence it should be an original factor to rank and evaluate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hornak</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/authority-and-trustrank/comment-page-1#comment-122392</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hornak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=811#comment-122392</guid>
		<description>&quot;branding, does the domain have a brand and how often does that brand or domain name get mentioned&quot;

I would really like to figure out how search engines determine a brand name. 

I would have to assume that search engine&#039;s would look at a unique phrase that is used many times on your website and also see if other websites are linking to you with that unique phrase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;branding, does the domain have a brand and how often does that brand or domain name get mentioned&#8221;</p>
<p>I would really like to figure out how search engines determine a brand name. </p>
<p>I would have to assume that search engine&#8217;s would look at a unique phrase that is used many times on your website and also see if other websites are linking to you with that unique phrase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchCap: The Day In Search, September 14, 2009</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/authority-and-trustrank/comment-page-1#comment-122313</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, September 14, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=811#comment-122313</guid>
		<description>[...] Authority and Trustrank, SEO 2.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Authority and Trustrank, SEO 2.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onreact</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/authority-and-trustrank/comment-page-1#comment-122239</link>
		<dc:creator>onreact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=811#comment-122239</guid>
		<description>Good point mat but domain age is here to stay. That&#039;s why domain history has been added as ranking factor to make sure the sheer age is not misused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point mat but domain age is here to stay. That&#8217;s why domain history has been added as ranking factor to make sure the sheer age is not misused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/authority-and-trustrank/comment-page-1#comment-122228</link>
		<dc:creator>mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/?p=811#comment-122228</guid>
		<description>About the domain name age, do you see this as something that will continue to carry weight? With people buying old domain names just for this purpose, this isnt something that i see having a continued impact. Just a feeling ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the domain name age, do you see this as something that will continue to carry weight? With people buying old domain names just for this purpose, this isnt something that i see having a continued impact. Just a feeling ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.533 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-02-19 14:15:29 -->
