Ads

Am I paranoid? Probably. Nonetheless, what I see at Mixx currently is exactly what I would expect at Digg. Of course on Digg you wouldn’t see it, as there the bury brigade can destroy the community while hiding behind anonymity. I would only see the consequences. Not at Mixx though.

Today I want to introduce to you the typical social media loser-abuser who destroys the community, any community, but I really support Mixx so I won’t sit still and do nothing about it this time.

In fact as negative votes or buries are displayed at Mixx you can look up who buried you. At first I thought that I will just reverse my usual social media strategy of being friendly to those who vote for you, blog about you, or support you otherwise online. I thought I will just bury their stuff too if they bury me for no apparent reason but it didn’t work out, I’ll tell you why.

First, let me tell you a little about me once again so that people can’t dismiss this too easily:

I am an online publisher for more than 10 years by now. I was very active in online literature, media activism, politics, avantgarde, web development etc. etc. long before starting to do SEO in 2004.

I explain that because people tend to see the word “SEO” and then cease to think showing signs of something you could call online road rage.

SEO? Most people who hate it do not get it, either they’re ignorant or they’re Internet newbies so they will attack people who explain SEO to others instead of, say, criticise wacky SEOs (many of whom exist and I criticise too).

I contributed to multiple mailing lists, forums, websites, ezines, blogs, web 2.0 communities of all kinds for free for ten years. So people who assume I am some kind of parasite because I do SEO, and SEO equals Spam for those slow minded people, couldn’t be more wrong.

I contributed more to the Net of altruistic motives and still do than they will manage too in the next 50 years.

Now many people will still be quick to judge me thinking something like “he’s only in it for SEO and submits only his own stuff etc.”. Well, it’s the other way around. I submit non-SEO stuff, mostly art, photography and news while I rarely submit my own stories, did once I think because someone submitted a page which stole my content so I submitted the original.

Nonetheless I admit on my user page that I am a SEO so that there nobody can say I’m sneaky or something. I’m more like a doctor. I’m a doctor without practicing medicine at Mixx ;-)

That said now I want to present to you the typical “I bury you for no reason”-social media loser-abuser at Mixx or rather 7 typical traits of such a person:

  1. Does not contribute to Mixx, has either no stories submitted, or predominantly his own.
  2. Most of the social media abusers at Mixx have very low and insignificant numbers of Karma Points, around or below 50. In contrast I have already above 400 after just a week of contributing.
  3. Has more stories buried than voted up or more or less the same number of both.
  4. Buries stories without any reason given. Whenever I bury everything I will comment why I did it: For instance: Stolen content, duplicate, abusive, advertising.
  5. Does not comment and in most cases has no avatar.
  6. Will bury several stories of mine in a row, although they have different sources and topics
  7. Has no friends on Mixx or if he has, he only has those he befriended but none or very few followers.

Now that said you probably think it happened at most two or three times. I can’t be that bad. But no, I just picked out 5 most recent social media loser-abusers who damage Mixx’s reputation and community. All of them started burying me yesterday.

Now what does this sound like? Sabotage? Are you paranoid? or are Digg users swarming in to destroy another community after they fucked Digg? I see plenty of them at StumbleUpon already. They abuse mostly female bloggers btw.

Now don’t get wrong, if those people change their destructive behaviour and start to contribute I won’t have a problem with them, but as of now they have to be exposed as the abusers they are before they destroy the nascent Mixx community which is by now still full of beautiful people I highly respect.

Here are the 5 Mixx lose-abusers of yesterday:

maestro.gif

maestro: 17 Karma Points; Submitted 1 (a Google Maps pic of a huge phallus)
Voted against 4 of my stories in a row: While a dumb pic of a huge phallus seem to be OK, he does not like a satirical art video where aliens abduct cows. He does not like a story from Israel’s Haaretz about Bush lying, not admitting that the Iranians have ceased their nuclear weapons program back in 2003. He also hates a hugy ducky on display in a European harbor, an oustanding art piece. Last but not least he hates female lips.

alakazam:1 Karma Point; Submitted 0; Voted Up 1 (A story about Digg); Voted Against (more than a dozen)
He hates art or giant ducks, unable to explain why.

StatiK: 58 Karma Points; Submitted 8 (5 of them his own forum featuring some dumb “fun” videos)
This guy is really prolific, he buries so many stories I had to view several pages to find mine of 3 days ago. He buried 4 submission of mine in a row, 3 of them art submissions and one a hugely popular activist website and video, The Story of Stuff. I do not expect everybody to appreciate art the way I do, but 4 in a row?

kbilling2: 7 Karma Points; Submitted 0
He does not like a story at Salon.com about Bush lying, this time pretending to offer negotiations to Iran

drew.streib: 14 Karma Points; Submitted 0;
Does not like lips, or does he hate women or art photography? Sadly he didn’t bother to explain what was wrong with my “Lips” submission.

drewstreib.gif

So you guys, go back to your caves or Digg or whatever but stop destroying Mixx you bastards! If you’re unable to contribute, stop sabotaging Mixx! Just go away!

Even if those guys are not paid by Kevin Rose himself they are exactly the breed I already expected to appear on Mixx sooner or later. Such people make the Digg experience so obnoxious. Don’t let them diggify Mixx! Please!

PS.: Of course I looked the guys up at Digg. While some have completely anonymous profile names others can be found on Digg as well.

del.icio.us StumbleUpon Facebook Google Mixx Sphinn TwitThis
December, 2007 | You can follow comments through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a comment, or trackback.

This thing has 13 Comments

  1. Posted December 10, 2007 at 6:07 pm | Permalink

    There are a lot of SEO haters… I am also pissed off when this people bury story right after they see “web marketing” or “googe” tag there.
    We need to check what they gonna do with Matt Cutts posts.

  2. Posted December 10, 2007 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    Well, I am not talking about Digg and I am not taling about SEO stories. I’m talking about art, photography and news submissions. Besides, Mixx is not a place where lots of SEO haters reside!

  3. Posted December 10, 2007 at 7:31 pm | Permalink

    Great post, Tad. Tell it like it is. It’s bewildering to me how some people can only get their kicks by demeaning, abusing, and ruining what can be a positive experience for others.

  4. Posted December 11, 2007 at 6:06 am | Permalink

    The worst of them all are on Reddit… even the most cherry, non-controversial, Reddit-worthy contributions are dinged by these people and never see the light of day…

  5. Dad
    Posted December 11, 2007 at 8:23 am | Permalink

    Give them hell kid! Thanks for calling a spade a spade.

  6. Posted December 11, 2007 at 9:12 am | Permalink

    Great post man, put those fools on blast! Watch out for the backlash, you know it’s going to happen.

  7. Posted December 11, 2007 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    What a cracking post !!!! Nice one, its about time these parasites are exposed !

  8. Posted December 11, 2007 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    Haha! This was my first vote on Mixx. Time to start stomping trolls yet, Tad? I got my steel toes on.

  9. Posted December 12, 2007 at 12:16 am | Permalink

    Yes I messed up and listed my own post under SEO. It was voted down in less than 30 minutes of being on Mixx.

    Pretentious voter downers suck butt.

  10. Posted December 13, 2007 at 2:26 am | Permalink

    I just saw this post today….fantastic!

    I am glad people like yourself do the journalistic research to call things like this out.

    Great post and great work….keep it up!

  11. Posted February 3, 2008 at 10:31 am | Permalink

    Before I touch on the series of points I have to make about this, I’d like to say that I thoroughly enjoyed reading this post - almost as much as I enjoyed reading the comment thread on this article’s Mixx page (I voted it up on the basis of it being an interesting read).

    That said, I do take issue with a couple of the statements made in the piece, although I have seen the very same odd voting patterns as the author, and by and large I agree that it is agenda-driven.

    Although some of the users behind the accounts from which the odd voting patterns have originated have clearly identified themselves as Digg users, it is not fair to attribute the entire phenomena to Diggers that can’t stand the thought of people frequenting news-aggregation sites other than Digg. Mixx is a community that is open to everyone (including Diggers) so long as everyone follows the rules, and there is simply not enough evidence to support the ‘coordinated conspiracy’ theory.

    Additionally, this type of behavior is common at all social media sites. It is even worse at third-party marketplaces and auction sites. If you wist to test this claim, set up a new account at Reddit, submit a random story and monitor how long it takes for the first negative vote to be recorded. 7 out of the 9 test-submissions I made at Reddit for the sake of this experiment were voted down to 0 within 5-10 minutes. In at least one case, a story I submitted that was quickly buried became popular several hours later when submitted by another user.

    At least negative votes are transparent at Mixx. Unfortunately, the reporting of user TOS violations is still anonymous at most if not all social media communities and marketplace/auction sites. This feature is severely abused at sites where low-wage employees are placed in charge of evaluating accusations of spam, TOS and listing violations.

    Some people will stoop to any depth if it means getting to take a cheap shot at someone they consider to be in competition with themselves. This can include voting down good content at Mixx, baseless spam accusations against competitors, multiple accounts for voting, comment intimidation (anonymously ripping a competitor’s article in the comment area in hopes of discouraging them from making future submissions and set a negative tone for the commenting) and probably other sinister tactics that I’ve yet to observe.

    The type of people described above cannot be overlooked when investigating the increasing amount of spammy votes, submissions and comments at Mixx.

    I’m no fan of Digg, but there is plenty of legitimate dirt to be had on Digg that doesn’t require speculative accusations that make the Mixx community look like a small crowd of internet vagrants and pissed off Digg-rejects.

    Finally, I disagree with your assertion that users that don’t submit are contributing little or nothing to the site. A person who visits Mixx from time to time to check out the news headlines and occasionally vote for those they deem important is an important Mixx user who’s contributions should not be overlooked. Just by being there, these casual users who go to Mixx to find the news provide an audience and voting base that is of value to everyone on the site. More voting activity will make Mixx more appealing to publishers who in turn will (hopefully) make well-rounded contributions in addition to submitting their own articles.

  12. Posted July 24, 2008 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    Hey this could be possible, lately many people have requested my friendship (with low karma), following me and submitting non-relevant content to my community on Mixx…

  13. Posted August 4, 2008 at 12:15 am | Permalink

    Mr. Javo, I think what you mean is another issue. This post is a little older. Right now Mixx gets flooded by many users who noticed it’s growing popularity and who want to capitalize on it with mostly crappy content.

One Trackback

  1. Posted December 10, 2007 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

    SEO 2.0 | Are Digg-Users Infiltrating Mixx to Sabotage it?…

    Is SEO 2.0 being targeted at Mixx to the extent of mass buries on every submitted article?

    Tad has written extensively about Mixx and how much better it is than Digg. Now, every article being submitted by Tad on Mixx is buried.

    Not to be one to take…

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*