<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Dirty Blogging Tricks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks</link>
	<description>Helping people with blogs, social media &#38; search</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:25:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO 2.0 &#124; The Most Important Difference Between Websites and Blogs</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-17607</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO 2.0 &#124; The Most Important Difference Between Websites and Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-17607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] few weeks later I published a post called 5 Dirty Blogging Tricks which covered this decision in a short [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few weeks later I published a post called 5 Dirty Blogging Tricks which covered this decision in a short [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onreact</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>onreact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 18:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Skellie: You do not get many visitors via Google because your blog is relatively new and you do not have many focused links yet. So it&#039;ll change in the future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Your idea is interesting. It depends on the type of content I guess, some things like &quot;New Wordpress 2.2 Is Out&quot; age very quickly so a date would help people to know that 2.2 is not the newest version if they read it, say, in 6 months from now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I guess the best way to add dates is to do it manually at the bottom of the post. Do it if you think it helps your visitors and don&#039;t add where it probably scares people off for no reason (as your blogging tips are timeless).&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skellie: You do not get many visitors via Google because your blog is relatively new and you do not have many focused links yet. So it&#8217;ll change in the future.</p>
<p>Your idea is interesting. It depends on the type of content I guess, some things like &#8220;New WordPress 2.2 Is Out&#8221; age very quickly so a date would help people to know that 2.2 is not the newest version if they read it, say, in 6 months from now.</p>
<p>I guess the best way to add dates is to do it manually at the bottom of the post. Do it if you think it helps your visitors and don&#8217;t add where it probably scares people off for no reason (as your blogging tips are timeless).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skellie</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Skellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So do you think it would be a good idea to keep dates on the main page (to show new visitors it is current) but remove them from post pages so search engine visitors don&#039;t know the content is old?

The only thing is... I don&#039;t get many search engine visitors, because I&#039;m terrible at SEO (and I also think it&#039;s hard to use keywords for my topic). But I guess that&#039;s an unrelated problem ;).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do you think it would be a good idea to keep dates on the main page (to show new visitors it is current) but remove them from post pages so search engine visitors don&#8217;t know the content is old?</p>
<p>The only thing is&#8230; I don&#8217;t get many search engine visitors, because I&#8217;m terrible at SEO (and I also think it&#8217;s hard to use keywords for my topic). But I guess that&#8217;s an unrelated problem ;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Ward</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 21:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This &quot;no dates&quot; idea is interesting. I don&#039;t break news on my blog, so I guess it doesn&#039;t matter when articles are written.  Good thoughts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This &#8220;no dates&#8221; idea is interesting. I don&#8217;t break news on my blog, so I guess it doesn&#8217;t matter when articles are written.  Good thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onreact</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>onreact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 07:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well Skellie, exactly! Just take your articles. Most of them are not news but timeless rules of online publishing, usability and content creation. So who cares for a date? In fact a date only makes it less likely that a first time visitor will read them.

Most normal websites that serve no news do not display dates. So you assume that the contents are still valid when you find them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Skellie, exactly! Just take your articles. Most of them are not news but timeless rules of online publishing, usability and content creation. So who cares for a date? In fact a date only makes it less likely that a first time visitor will read them.</p>
<p>Most normal websites that serve no news do not display dates. So you assume that the contents are still valid when you find them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skellie</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Skellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 00:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s an interesting idea about not putting dates on posts. What if the article is sort of timeless though? As in, it doesn&#039;t lose relevance with time?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting idea about not putting dates on posts. What if the article is sort of timeless though? As in, it doesn&#8217;t lose relevance with time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onreact</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>onreact</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, right Kelly, but what for? Polluting large parts of your blog? Rather wait 3 months and if the blogs runs all right and you probably got some PageRank by then you can sell some text links and earn more than that. 30$ is a very reasonable price for a PageRank 4 blog text link and many blogs reach PR 4. 
This is not SEO 2.0 but sufficient for many people, especially in countries where most people earn 30$ a month.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, right Kelly, but what for? Polluting large parts of your blog? Rather wait 3 months and if the blogs runs all right and you probably got some PageRank by then you can sell some text links and earn more than that. 30$ is a very reasonable price for a PageRank 4 blog text link and many blogs reach PR 4.<br />
This is not SEO 2.0 but sufficient for many people, especially in countries where most people earn 30$ a month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Dodson</title>
		<link>http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Dodson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seo2.0.onreact.com/5-dirty-blogging-tricks#comment-251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...but, $50/month sounds pretty good to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;but, $50/month sounds pretty good to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
