SEO BLOG

Search & Social Media Survival Guide

personal-preference-kevin-dooley

Image: Personal Preference by Kevin Dooley.

Google gets personal: Now everybody will get personalized search results based on their search habits in the past unless they opt out in a tedious process. So most people won’t opt out or even notice at all, at least at first.

  1. The rich will get richer, that is the attention rich. Those sites that have a brand and/or audience already will profit from Google personal search results. The sites people already click most often will rank on top. Wikipedia will dominate even more.
  2. People will get confused. “Yesterday it was there when I checked it at home!” might become a common exclamation in the near future. People switching computers (home/mobile/work) will face different results unless they use all of them in a highly similar manner.
  3. SEOs will finally focus on conversions and ROI. Lazy SEOs still stick to rankings no matter how profitable they are. Checking rankings will become even more pointless from now on. Conversions and ROI are key to measuring success now more than ever.
  4. John Doe bloggers will end up ghettoized. You have below 50 subscribers? These people will find you on Google. The others won’t anymore as Wikipedia, NYT, CNN, BBC and Yahoo Answers a well as Huntington Post, TechCrunch and Engadget etc. will push you further down.
  5. Social Media sites will get more user generated content (UGC) as people will try to get some traffic from the few remaining behemoth sites lucky enough to get clicked in search results often enough to get a push.
  6. The Web will become boring. People will visit more and more of the same sites. It will become more and more difficult to find new things, original sources and small time publishers.
  7. SEO Noobs will try to convince you that SEO is dead. SEO is dead all the time. Even I said so, but I meant a different thing than the people who have no clue about SEO. I meant that SEO has changed in a way that you wouldn’t recognize it as the SEO we’re accustomed to. The “SEO is dead” bunch assumes that personal search results can’t get optimized. Of course they can.
  8. More group blogs will emerge to make sure to get at least the same attention as some big name bloggers and news outlets.
  9. Old and new social filters might re/appear. As people will want to rely on crowdsourcing rather than their own limited search habits they’ll look after ways to determine what’s good and what not with a little help of their friends.
  10. Google will gain even more power and your privacy will become a thing of the past. Google knows what you are searching for but now it will tell your family, flat mates or coworkers. So make sure not to use Google for that xxx stuff in case you want to keep your deviations private.
  11. The sheer number of people ranking a site on top will push it for others as well. Finally click through data will become the new Google PageRank. When 1000 people click your link repeatedly in the search results you can’t be wrong can you?
  12. You will have to optimize your blog for returning visitors in order to get search traffic, even first timers. This contradiction will lead to some new hitherto unknown SEO tactics.

Btw. Danny Sullivan expected this to happen since 2001. In an article called “Google May get Personal” he also explains why one of the personal search results startups failed though:

People “were afraid to miss something”.

My head is already buzzing with ideas on how to optimize for Google personal search (even if it’s still just called Google). That’s the great thing about SEO. It never gets stale. You always have to come up with new things to please Google and search users. Also most people don’t get it and thus SEO will live forever.

What tactics do you plan to employ to attract Google personal search visitors?

Suggestions in the comments might get used in my next blog post either here or on SEOptimise. That means a link to the source.

Related posts:

  1. 10 New Google Personal Search Blogging, Social Media & SEO Tactics
  2. 30 Hands On Google Search Plus SEO Techniques for Getting Personal
  3. The ROI of Blogging and Social Media
  4. Top 10 Reasons Why SEOs Fail on Social Media
  5. hkcMjRm: How to Use Google as URL Shortener

December 7, 2009 | You can follow comments through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a comment, or trackback.

Need help? Consider a world class blog & SEO consultation by the author of SEO 2.0, Tad Chef. For full fledged SEO services like ongoing link building, contact my partners from SEO.com or look up my directory of SEO service providers and checkout reputable companies like Datadial or Redfly.

Already an SEO? Consider applying to be added to my exclusive SEO agency directory. Only selected companies get included. Find out whether you are eligible to submit your site.

This thing has 16 Comments

  1. Posted December 8, 2009 at 00:51 | Permalink

    I don’t plan to do a blasted thing differently.

    Oh, OK, I do plan to organize my time better so that I can post more frequently across the 3 blogs that I write, but I planned to do that before the latest Google pronouncement.

    My SEO methodology is to post reasonably often about topics that interest me and that I think my blog readers would benefit from and enjoy. I try to use keywords that make sense, I give thought to my post title based on how I think people might look for my info, and I SEO-optimize the heck out of photos and video.

    None of that will change.

    Sure, real-time sites like Twitter and Facebook are becoming more important in search, but I’m already a chatty sort and I’m already there. Holy cow, if I tweeted any more, my long-suffering husband would stop cooking, and THAT would be a disaster. :)

    What I WILL do differently is to pound away on my tourism clients even more about the importance of not deferring all knowledge of search to “the IT guy” because it’s “too technical.” They have got to understand how people are finding out about their destinations/attractions, and it is not by ordering a doggone brochure. It is by search, and they’d better get ahead of it.

    Thanks very much for your post (and for the tweet that brought me here.)

  2. Posted December 8, 2009 at 15:11 | Permalink

    Her Sheila, thank you for your thorough feedback on this issue.

    As far as I understand you don’t want to change much.
    Don’t you think that having 3 blogs will be a drawback in the future?
    Having just one flagship blog people more often click in search results might be better option search wise from now on.

  3. Posted December 9, 2009 at 10:40 | Permalink

    Love this post… and the picture too!! You’re so right, SEO has not time to get stale. There is always something new and exciting evolving. Search Marketing Experts are in a great business when it comes to SEO because they will always have security in this arena!

  4. Posted December 21, 2009 at 12:10 | Permalink

    I have always knew this change is something unavoidable for Google, future of search engines will be more and more user driven just like social media sites. SEO professionals will have to get more clever and do some politics to get their site up and Google will start to make more money from adwords and its a good news for adsense publishers with a popular site as they will start to see their earnings shoot up.

  5. Posted December 28, 2009 at 18:24 | Permalink

    I think the internet will surely go through some significant changes in the very near future. It seems like many people flock to a select few giants and the rest just wait and hope they are discovered.

  6. Jarkko
    Posted January 8, 2010 at 12:51 | Permalink

    I dont think that personalized search is something bad. Because only thing that changes is that you find the same page easier. And it only has affect to pages that you have searched, not to pages that you have visited.

  7. Posted January 11, 2010 at 05:10 | Permalink

    One thing I’ve wondered about personal search and the long tail. If somebody has clicked through on my site for let’s say – Cambridge parking tickets – is the website going to rank higher in his next search for ex., Cambridge restaurants? If that’s so it seems to bode well for rich content and “off-topic” posts as long as those are pulling in local readers.

  8. ricardo
    Posted January 11, 2010 at 05:50 | Permalink

    this change is really unavoidable for Google. lets see for significant changes this near future

  9. Posted January 12, 2010 at 12:47 | Permalink

    Liz: This is a very good question and I guess Google is aware of this issue. As of now I might imagine that you can get away with getting the clicks for the long tail while ranking higher for other more general terms as well.

    They will tweak that soon though I guess so i’d use this technique now but wouldn’t rely on it for future rankings.

    To be honest I think Google has hurried the “real time” introduction a bit so that this feature is still quite immature.

  10. Posted January 15, 2010 at 07:57 | Permalink

    lets see what’s next in the future . Hope Google will make it though.
    they should be flexible for what might happen.

  11. Lampica
    Posted March 1, 2010 at 09:16 | Permalink

    I suggest we start using different search engines. For about the past 5 months it generally takes me several hours to find the info I am actually in need of when using google. I switched to google over a decade ago because their results would get me my answers in less time. When that ceases to be the case then it is time to move on.

    I don’t want to know what is popular or what everyone else is looking at.. I want specific information which addresses specific issues. I don’t care how long the site has been around or how many people like the site, or how fresh the content is! All of this is just irrelevant BS and is getting in the way of me finding my answer ASAP!

    Everyone who ever thought about starting their own organic search engine, now is the time to do it. Google’s position is weak right now and they are leaving themselves wide open to getting stomped by some fresh thinkers out of left field.

    Google has become a common verb (‘just google it’) but everyone uses google because ‘we’ told them to. ‘We’ being a small minority of computer people. ‘We’ are the people that all our friends look to when they want to know anything about computers. As soon as this minority decides that some new search engine does it better, the change will happen like wildfire, because everyone listens to us when it comes to these matters. Almost everyone I know who uses google does so because I told them too about a decade ago, and if it wasn’t me, then it was some other member of our minority who told them to.

    Google now sees their numbers and they think they are all but unstoppable now, they imagine that their position is unassailable. Really all we need is a viable alternative because google’s huge number of users look to a very small subset of people for guidance. It is not an online minority which can be manipulated or relegated to obscurity online either. It is real world social circles who hang out together in real life and every such circle has a couple people who the rest look to when it comes to computers.

  12. Posted March 31, 2010 at 12:24 | Permalink

    Because of change many persons get confused & because of this they never like to do SEO.

  13. Posted April 16, 2010 at 12:49 | Permalink

    SEO has definitely become more personalised. So much so that search engine have had to embrace Facebook and Twitter.
    By overlooking visitors different spaces (home, office, mobile) you miss out on a huge world of SEO.
    My tip, optimise for your dad, use words and especially phrases that they would use in your content otherwise you lose.

  14. Seo Teen
    Posted May 7, 2010 at 15:19 | Permalink

    wow man you couldn’t had put it any better i agree so much with this websites like wiki that has information on basically any subject and are always ranking in top results will now dominate the serps even more then they allready do..this was the stupidest idea ever man..they are basically making sites like wiki that have information on everything take over..and all those people who were making those small niche sites might wanna just make one big site

  15. Posted July 20, 2010 at 15:24 | Permalink

    I think personal search is unfair to new sites that want to compete with the more established ones in the same niche. Google might be thinking “if you’re good, you’re good and you will rank well regardless.”

  16. Posted September 3, 2010 at 22:17 | Permalink

    So much time has passed, but the paper has not lost its relevance

One Trackback

  1. Posted January 14, 2010 at 15:10 | Permalink

    [...] sein bisheriges Suchverhalten abgestimmte Ergebnisse anzeigt (Tipp zum Deaktivieren). Man kann sich ausrechnen, dass die Gewinner der Personalisierung die Big Player unter den Websites sein werden, die sowieso [...]

Post a Comment

Please mind the commenting netiquette, most notably:

  • A "name" is a real name or nick name, not a keyword! SEO Company is wrong. John Doe of Google is OK.
  • For the "website" URL: No deep links allowed unless it's your "about" page.
  • No extra signature allowed, one "website" link is enough.
  • No bot-like "Thank you" comments with no context or added value to the post.

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*